Mikrotik lacp hardware offload not working 3beta37 MikroTik. 48. 1. I have recently updated this and wanted to update my cAP AC to also utilize hardware switching. Config on CRS326-24G-2S+ MikroTik. Post by orangetek » Fri Jul 20, 2018 12:26 pm. Traffic between an ethernet port and the radio has to be handled by the CPU as the wireless drivers run on it. skotti just joined Posts: 10 Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2016 11:47 am. I have used sw LACP bonding (802. Router is accessible. One of our lan switch (ubiquiti usw-pro-48-poe) is connected to the sfp+ ports of the router (Mikrotik CCR2004-16g The bridge port with hw offload on was the eth1+eth2 bond. 47 release for netPower devices. Posts: 10 Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2016 11:47 am. Thanks to this wiki I found I configured my Cloud Router improperly and was not utilizing hardware switching. Just curious, what is the temperature of the S+RJ10 module during the test? I bought Wiitek SFP-10G-T and It is not made by MikroTik but it's temperature is 43C max. Your random VLAN inaccessibility sounds weird. prawira Trainer Posts: 357 Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 4:11 am. But the key is that inter-VLAN traffic from a VLAN on the bridge to another VLAN on the bridge is Nice to hear that hardware routing works and ipfix got fixed! Connection tracking does not work with hardware routing since the packets never enter the CPU, and the switch chip does not provide the routing performance data. I have several questions : Currently the Cisco switch is working nicely together with a HP switch (which I want to replace with the CRS326) using an existing LACP bond. 6) - - No LACP - No VLANs the FW compatible L3HW offload is not working with inter-vlan traffic. Quick Hardware Offload or Not Hardware Offload. Hardware offload allows you to bypass this bottleneck, as the I believe I'm not that far from a working a scenario, but I'm missing something, googling it gives me different answers then what I'm looking for. LACP: RouterBOARD hardware. densukke just joined Posts: 16 Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2022 2:11 pm. The performance was identical. But bonding2 is working in active/backup mode and there is no packet loss with this configuration but we are not able to have 4Gbps in total. I would like to know if the chips of the rb's 922 and hEX support hardware offload, I see mention of hEX, but even enabling the option in the interface inside the bridge does not appear the H in the list of bridge interfaces. MLAG peer link is a 802. Thu Apr 28, 2022 1:42 pm. So am not sure if the Problem is software related to the devices that do not support LACP on hardware level Thank you for the tip (hardware offload) - will try it today at night. 3ad packets coming from the device but not on the CSS326, the CSS326 see's lacp packets coming from the device (on the lag page I can see the partner mac's), but never associates it to a trunk interface for some reason. But the key is that inter-VLAN traffic from a VLAN on the bridge to another VLAN on the bridge is When I switch to tag 40 it's not working. On Mikrotik, it seems not, a bonding between SFP28-1, SFP28-2 and a DELL switch does not get in running state except if I reboot the switch, and any other modification by this Does VRF HW offload work on any MikroTik hardware? Thanks! Top. I have seen the following. 178. Note that bonding interfaces on CRS1xx/CRS2xx are not hardware offloaded, you should use trunking interfaces instead. RouterOS 7. Instead of reading poorly-written tutorials, go straight to the documentation. Post by blacksnow also here is the link to the larger thread where some other attempts have been made and also similar examples of it not working for other people Apr 28 2022 12:34:26 HUAWEI %%01LACP/3/OPTICAL_FIBER_MISCONNECT(l):CID=0x80480430;The member of the LACP mode Eth-Trunk interface received an abnormal LACPDU, which may be caused by optical fiber misconnection or changed packet. L3HW Firewall Offloading - Doesn't Offload Inter-VLAN traffic [SOLVED] Please report all issues also here is the link to the larger thread where some other attempts have been made and also similar examples of it not working for can anybody please confirm or disagress LACP is not working with CHR and GNS3 or even not working at all? CHR: /system resource print uptime: 21h58m18s MikroTik Current bonding config /interface bonding print Flags: X - disabled, R MikroTik Community discussions General. The built-in switch chip will always use Layer2+Layer3+Layer4 for a transmit hash policy, Following this guide (https://help. 4. Hardware offloading for bonding interface not working in CRS326. This server does not get any traffic from any other server nor can it send traffic to any other server unless I disable Hardware offloading on the Bridge Port (sr-wan) to which the server is connected. So yes, if you use bonding on RB5009, that means all traffic between bond and the rest of ports will have to pass switch-CPU interconnect and will have to be dealt with by CPU. 41 contains new bridge implementation that supports hardware offloading (hw-offload). macsrwe Forum Guru Posts: 1008 As of now there is NO hardware support for LACP in 6. Skip to content. BFD MikroTik. Which means that single client (same MAC and IP address) will always use single connection towards NAS even if running multiple simultaneous transfers (which may differ on L4 - TCP port number). A ISP that are buying a switch with 16x 100Gbps port is not a small ISP and probably is delivering all the services that I listed, so solution like Huawei and Cisco are better options, but when Mikrotik implement a full MPLS hardware offload this vendors will be less used because of the price and commodity of the winbox interface. On all of the examples a LACP port-channel works as expected. I know the LACP implementation from other network vendors, where forming an LACP with one link only is no issue. No problem with non-bond port. 3ad) in hardware offload mode- so if you want all the traffic to stay within the switch chip (not sent through the very weak CPU) then The crs1xx and crs2xx series switch chips doesn‘t support lacp hardware offloadingtherefore it has to be handled by the cpu and it’s unusable for production. "Hardware Offload" on ports. Hardware offload is MikroTik. This untagged VLAN can be configured with vlan-filtering and pvid. FAQ; Posts: 48 Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2023 3:46 pm. For example: if server has a LACP connection to two MLAG-configured switches (server is not aware of MLAG, it uses RouterBOARD hardware. LACP CCR2004 - Huawei Switch not working. 1 was released on 2021-Dec-21. on the network, at 6 hop distance from the 317, I have a router 2004 with 7. and state is disabled. 3beta37 Currently the Cisco switch is working nicely together with a HP switch (which I want to replace with the CRS326) using an existing LACP bond. So 20G uplink via LACP bonding, independent of any bridges. L3HW Firewall Offloading - Doesn't Offload Inter-VLAN traffic. My config is back to defaults with only the bonds still added, if anyone could help out with one of the trunks (e. skotti. Disabling hardware offload in the bridge settings for the 1Gb ports seems to help, at least with my simple setup. On this device I have some critical traffic (EF and AF) that needs to be prioritized on the egress ports. The 4011 does not have Hardware Offloading with HW offload. There are plans to add VRF L3HW, but I cannot share the ETA at the moment of writing. MLAG on 2 x CRS354-48G-2S+2Q+ switches continues to be a problem. But the key is that inter-VLAN traffic from a VLAN on the bridge to another VLAN on the bridge is I was really liking the auto-lacp feature until i tried it on the CSS326. Re: cAP ax Wifi not working. LACP CCR2004 - Huawei Switch not working . 42. 1x authentication (dot1x) not working; LACP interface not passing traffic; Solution. MLAG setup must be done using single bridge as well as bridge The CRS1xx and CRS2xx models cannot support LACP (802. RouterBOARD hardware. prawira Trainer Posts: 361 Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 4:11 am. This VRF is part of an MPLS L3VPN, but the test scenario is just between two nodes connected to two different VLANs, two different subnets, same VRF routing between each other. MikroTik. no other services on it. But the key is that inter-VLAN traffic from a VLAN on the bridge to another VLAN on the bridge is Hello, good morning everyone. Post by skotti » Thu It seems to be hitting the CRS CPU too, so I think L3HW is really not working right now. just joined. . Simply doing L3HW offloading with no firewall expectations which is basically L2 switching + CRS326 and 802. proplist" argument; *) bridge - properly process IPsec decapsulated packets through the firewall when the "use-ip-firewall" option is enabled; *) capsman - require a unique name for configuration and configuration pre-sets; *) certificate - fixed new CRL updating The hw. On Mikrotik, it seems not, a bonding between SFP28-1, SFP28-2 and a DELL switch does not get in running state except if I reboot the switch , and any other modification by this Hello everyone! I have 2 CRS504 and the plan was to implement LACP+MLAG for the physical redundancy of the server. Hi there, Have a CRS317-1G-16S+. L3HW not working properly. Unfortunately, L3HW doesn't support VRF yet. Depending on the complexity, one ACL rule may occupy the memory of 3-6 MikroTik. On the CRS317 I can see 802. Hw-offload on RB4011 not working. Not understand if it is normal that hw offloading can cause this issue or there is something Wanted to ask for a little help in converting the below setup to hw offload on a 4011. But if the Sophos doesn't support static LAG then you are stuck with an impasse. There are certain configurations that are known to have major flaws by design and should be avoided by all means possible. In addition to this, you might want to consult the block diagram for your device. There is a larger thread in the general discussion where multiple people have reported the same issue but I didn't see a detailed post in the bug section outlining the issue so I'll try and make this as clean as possible to get the quickest resolution (either it is a bug, or its the intended functionality). ". 11 - kid control not working? [SOLVED] RouterOS general discussion. Post by densukke » Thu Jan 05, 2023 12 I am testing the MLAG feature and I have an issue when primary switch is down. FAQ; Home. At the end I am getting 300 Mbps and 100% CPU load on the primary mikrotik out of the 100 GB port. 6) - - No LACP - No VLANs Must create mangle rules to use fasttrack on connections that you want to offload to hardware MikroTik may be able to comment if the gap on these limitations has closed between 7. HW Offload on LAN ports not working. My bridge has 8 VLANs as well. Post by pandreozzi » Mon Mar 20, 2023 5:41 pm. 5Gbs and another 1G) wifi connection, according to the manufacturer GRANDSTREAM the AP supports LAG or link aggregation which on Mikrotik is called bonding, from the AP side There Unfortunately, L3HW doesn't support VRF yet. Hello, good morning everyone. I have replaced the 1072 to the 317 to have more ports, hardware lacp, and hardware routing. The only Mikrotik switches which support hardware offloaded LACP are the CRS3xx series. mikrotik. That Interface A connects to Switch 1 and Interface B connects to Switch 2. e. 3beta37 can anybody please confirm or disagress LACP is not working with CHR and GNS3 or even not working at all? CHR: /system resource print uptime: MikroTik Current bonding config /interface bonding print Flags: X - disabled, R ↳ RouterBOARD hardware; ↳ The User Manager; ↳ SwOS; ↳ Containers; I am new to Mikrotik, been using Force10, Cisco, HP and lately Dell, Extreme Networks CER2024 and Ruckus ICX switches. 1ad config on FreeBSD is ok, at least it works with a Cisco Nexus 3000 used for reference. At the last step, when "printing" the details of the configuration, I can't have hardware offload on the bond1 as a bridge port. Hi, LACP between a CCR2004-16G-2S+ (ROS 7. Post by densukke » Thu Jan 05, 2023 12 (yesterday I was doing the whole routine of configuring "balancing" on new mikrotik router, and accidentally noticed that I forgot to write about this here, when was remaking the rules) UPD: its probably not a big deal for TCP, when NAT/masquerade is ON, but it may cause problems with UDP. File must be generated while router is not working as suspected or after crash. I've disabled the HW offload, rebooted the router, but still, no link on the management port (eth1). RouterOS general discussion. 8 Mpps on the hardware without any CPU usage. Jonkheer. Worth a try if you haven't tried it already. Re: L3HW Offload and VRF not working? Post by raimondsp » Mon Oct 07, 2024 11:15 am. I'm getting close to 900 from the 1Gb ports on the RB5009 from the Internet and nearly full speed locally. 6 when "printing" the details of the configuration, I can't have hardware offload on the bond1 as a bridge port. Post by willr » Mon Nov 22, 2021 2:13 pm. 5 working OK. Basic L3HW offload is working on 7. Using the BW Test and UDP i can reach 200 Mbps, and that is the same thing i need but for TCP. 7 posts • Page 1 of 1. 1 server is connected with 802. 3ad (LACP) bond interface utilising two Q+ (40G) ports with MikroTik DACs. EDIT: The "bond" type interface on the CRS1xx and CRS2xx switches is definitely CPU-only, even if you set it up in a static configuration. A few weeks ago I tested L3HW and was getting ~10Gbps in each direction The hardware (switch chip) supports it, but the feature has not yet been implemented in RouterOS. I'm using 7. 2 and that this bug is fixed in 7. That's because hEX doesn't support bonding in HW (read this article, it has a part explaining HW offload support). You can only hardware offload on one bridge at a time. 1D and IEEE 802. It seems that RB5009 is in the same boat (for now). In MLAG setup, the interconnect between collaborating switches is not active/backup kind of link, it's ICCP link (see MLAG manual) which is always active and passes traffic between switches which wouldn't otherwise reach destination. 5G (with 2ports, 1 2. configured: OSPF , MPLS and hardware offload setup according to mikrotik "L3 Hardware Offloading" help page hardware mpls seems to be working only when single tag is present when i stretch EoIP tunnel between HEX1 and HEX2, CRS is not using CPU and everything is nice I have the same issue. CRS317 - ROS-6. I don't understand what is the differences in this scenario between VLAN 188 and the "local" ones from a routing perspective. I somehow doubt that all of the employees work on all of the issues, and that fixing problems that crash the router e. com/docs/display/ROS/L3+Hardware+Offloading), I tried first to use switch ACL rules but it is stateless and it does not seem to work (traffic is I'm trying to set up an untagged LACP link aggregation with 2 LAN interfaces, connected to my Mikrotik Switch running the SwOS operating system (CRS326). raimondsp MikroTik Support Posts: 287 Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2020 8:14 am. *1 When the HW limit of Fasttrack or NAT entries is reached, other connections will fall back to the CPU. 85 should be reachable from the external network (is working) and from the internal network (not working). *2 Fasttrack connections share the same HW memory with ACL rules. Term Frequent Visitor Posts: 92 RouterOS ICCP does not require an IP configuration, but it should be isolated from the rest of the network using a dedicated untagged VLAN. And why I At the last step, when "printing" the details of the configuration, I can't have hardware offload on the bond1 as a bridge port. In our case port 2 and port4 will run LACP. MikroTik Support Posts: 88 Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2017 3:51 pm Post by artz » Mon Apr 30, 2018 8:42 am. I have several Only 802. But the key is that inter-VLAN traffic from a VLAN on the bridge to another VLAN on the bridge is 2) In a more complex setup I am able to get non-VLAN traffic from another port on the CCR (like sfp28-2) to any VLAN on the bridge to be offloaded. Specifically, the FW compatible L3HW offload is not working with inter-vlan traffic. 43 it is possible to partly disable compliance with IEEE 802. /interface bridge set Forwarding now works for all devices except server2 within VLAN 1099. Models No internet access or communication between PC's. I am new to Mikrotik, been using Force10, Cisco, HP and lately Dell, Extreme Networks CER2024 and Ruckus ICX switches. 3ad on hardware Level. proplist" argument; *) bridge - properly process IPsec decapsulated packets through the firewall when the "use-ip-firewall" option is enabled; *) capsman - require a unique name for configuration and configuration pre-sets; *) certificate - fixed new CRL updating Re: LACP CCR2004 - Huawei Switch not working Post by skotti » Fri Apr 29, 2022 12:20 pm I can confirm that's a bug in ROS 7. A few weeks ago I tested L3HW and was getting ~10Gbps in each I only get 100 Mbps when there are multiple conecctions, the round robin is working because i can see 50 Mbps on each interface, but if i create more tcp connections just reduce the bandwidth for the already stablished connections. (TRK1) and switch ports on first trunk group are bound with 'v' flag. One link might be working with a LAGG when it's statically configured. Must create mangle rules to use fasttrack on connections that you want to offload to hardware MikroTik may be able to comment if the gap on these limitations has closed between 7. Quick links. Really bad about the Mikrotik implementation is, that the LACP gets down again when one of two links is failing. RouterOS beta and rc versions. With default "protocol-mode=rstp" these non-forwardable packets are always redirected to Disabling hardware offloading on a bridge port solved the issue. Do VLAN members use dynamic or static IP addresses? Here's the list of what's been fixed since 7. Any thoughts are greatly appreciated, also here is the link to the larger Re: LACP CCR2004 - Huawei Switch not working Post by skotti » Fri Apr 29, 2022 12:20 pm I can confirm that's a bug in ROS 7. I found a clear guide about this on the wiki, but found hardware offloading not to be active on the bond after following the guide. 3. 5) and a Huawei Switch could not be established. But the key is that inter-VLAN traffic from a VLAN on the bridge to another VLAN on the bridge is MikroTik Community discussions General. 1ad (2 * GE). 3ad) on routers with RouterOS for many years without any Return to “RouterBOARD hardware with HW offload. 1, 7. On Mikrotik, it seems not, a bonding between SFP28-1, SFP28-2 and a DELL switch does not get in running state except if I reboot the switch, and any other modification by this configured: OSPF , MPLS and hardware offload setup according to mikrotik "L3 Hardware Offloading" help page hardware mpls seems to be working only when single tag is present when i stretch EoIP tunnel between HEX1 and HEX2, CRS is not using CPU and everything is nice MikroTik Community discussions General. /interface/vlan). ips Member Candidate Posts: 154 Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2023 4:48 pm Location: Italy. 9 posts • Page 1 of 1. Post by densukke » Thu Jan 05, 2023 12 Does anyone know how to set a bonding with 2 interfaces and an access point? Like I have a Routerboard which has 2 1G ports and the AP supports an aggregate of 2. Perhaps try reading through the list to see if it's mentioned, or just skip the reading and go straight to updating to a newer version MikroTik. I also didn’t see any problems with 1 static route or 1000 static routes in terms of hardware offload. The only thing that has been changed in that time is VLAN membership of various ports (i. Then it starts working again and traffic being forwarded as before. When I launch a reboot, the MLAG is put on pause on the second switchj annd all slave sconnectiosn stops to work. RouterOS. The goal is that the server with IP 192. Verify if LACP is working: If you don't see both ports on the list then something is wrong and LACP is not going to work. Posts: 5 Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2018 9:27 pm. The hardware (switch chip) supports it, but the feature has not yet been implemented in RouterOS. 168. Configure all your Layer 2 stuff first: 1) Configure port L2MTU's, configure bonds (LACP) 2) Build your bridge, add ports to bridge 3) Create VLANs (assigned to bridge), change VLAN MTUs (if not 1500), assign IP's to VLANs, enable VLANs on bridge ports For SFP1 and SFP2, both being independent paths towards the CPU, you could put them in bride3, but I wouldn't advise this, as you will likely want to make SFP1-2 an LACP bonding to your uplink, so the LACP bonding and the underlying physical ports are not members of any bridges at all. Config on CRS326-24G-2S+ But bonding2 is working in active/backup mode and there is no packet loss with this configuration but we are not able to have 4Gbps in total. Sadly it The "not hw offloaded" : error will occur, if the bridge or bridge/port does not utilize Layer 2 hardware offloading. MikroTik's smart connection offload algorithm ensures that the connections with the most traffic are offloaded to the hardware. 1Q, this can be done by changing the bridge protocol mode. 2) In a more complex setup I am able to get non-VLAN traffic from another port on the CCR (like sfp28-2) to any VLAN on the bridge to be offloaded. Currently the Cisco switch is working nicely together with a HP switch (which I want to replace with the CRS326) using an existing LACP bond. Hi, Unfortunately, L3HW doesn't support VRF yet. Any idea why that port would not work? Thanks! But the moment hardware routing is removed in the routing table (because one of the port does not HW offload anymore), the Internet traffic is using the CPU and is capped at 400Mbits. 6 and 7. 7 on CRS310, 317, and CCR2116. Test scenario: Two interfaces in the same VRF. Have you tried it on the CRS317? Did you solve it? Top . No problem with non-bond port Basic L3HW offload is working on 7. 802. But the key is that inter-VLAN traffic from a VLAN on the bridge to another VLAN on the bridge is MikroTik. Config on CRS326-24G-2S+ with HW offload. Config on CRS326-24G-2S+ Code: Select all My guess is that "protocol-mode=none" together with HW offloading on 88E6393X, 88E6191X, 88E6190 switch chips does not correctly receive them and LACP negotiation fails. In mikrotik heX S board, when the router is working, the total percentage of the processor shows 20%, The reason for this is that the SFP port does not support the Hardware offload, it loads a separate CPU and it is not part of the switch. This connection does not HW offload and therefore there is a poor performance and high CPU load. thanks, but how can i choose what bridge is the HWOFF configured on? or only on the first created bridge is where HWOFF will work? I know the LACP implementation from other network vendors, where forming an LACP with one link only is no issue. I'm using a CCR2216-1G-12XS-2XQ. 3ad not working [SOLVED] nicoguido. Any thoughts are greatly appreciated, also here is the link to the larger configured: OSPF , MPLS and hardware offload setup according to mikrotik "L3 Hardware Offloading" help page hardware mpls seems to be working only when single tag is present when i stretch EoIP tunnel between HEX1 and HEX2, CRS is not using CPU and everything is nice Re: Netpower 16P hardware offload not on Post by Guntis » Fri Jun 26, 2020 6:50 am Unfortunately, there is an issue with hardware offloading in 6. I have 3 networks (internal=vlan1, iot=vlan2, guest=vlan3) and access points connected to ether3-4-5 that transmit vlan tagged & untagged packets, an internal device connected to ether2 & the top 3 ports (ether8-9-10) belong to iot devices. On Mikrotik, it seems not, a bonding between SFP28-1, SFP28-2 and a DELL switch does not get in running state except if I reboot the switch, and any other modification by this I am new to Mikrotik, been using Force10, Cisco, HP and lately Dell, Extreme Networks CER2024 and Ruckus ICX switches. ICX <-> CRS) that would get me started for the other devices as my topology is "basic" in a certain sense. Just tested the behavior. g. offload is working on all ports, including the bonding the SFP+ ports, and have had no problem since, I use the same SFP+ port that did the flap, but without bonding it does not flap. Misconfigured Layer2 can sometimes cause hard to detect network errors, random performance drops, certain segments of a network to be unreachable, certain networking services to be malfunctioning, or a complete network failure. Likewise on the CRS3xx devices hardware offload does not apply to traffic being routed, firewalled, or otherwise processed by the CPU. If i disable Hardware offload for I am new to Mikrotik, been using Force10, Cisco, HP and lately Dell, Extreme Networks CER2024 and Ruckus ICX switches. Do VLAN members use dynamic or static IP addresses? I do not know which of the MikroTik employees is/are working on this and if we ever see them here, but it looks like they are overburdened in finishing their work. I'm Disabling hardware offload in the bridge settings for the 1Gb ports seems to help, at least with my simple setup. Code: Select all [densukke@Valhalla2] > interface bridge port print Flags: X - disabled, I - inactive, D - dynamic, H - hw-offload # INTERFACE BRIDGE HW PVID PRIORITY PATH-COST INTERNAL-PATH-COST HORIZON 0 H ether1 Bridge-wan yes 1 0x80 10 10 none 1 ether2 Bridge-lan yes 1 0x80 10 10 none 2 ether3 Bridge-lan yes 1 0x80 10 10 none 3 I ether4 The hw. 5 posts • Page 1 of 1. HW Offload on LAN ports not working [SOLVED] RouterOS general discussion. Remove the wan bridge, as it is not a bridged interface by default. Since RouterOS v6. Top. There is an article which says that it is not possible to use hardware offloading with the MLAG feature. Forum index. 3ad) on routers with RouterOS for many years without any Return to “RouterBOARD hardware There is a larger thread in the general discussion where multiple people have reported the same issue but I didn't see a detailed post in the bug section outlining the issue so I'll try and make this as clean as possible to get the quickest resolution (either it is a bug, or its the intended functionality). 1 (latest stable as of now) and I had the management port with no link after enabled the HW offload. Register; Login with HW offload. Post by ips » Sun Jun 02, 2024 5: if its not working then the issue is within your Forwarding now works for all devices except server2 within VLAN 1099. So am not sure if the Problem is software related to the devices that do not support LACP on hardware level Limitations of fw-offload (as of 7. This translates in my network to the following rules: Does VRF HW offload work on any MikroTik hardware? Thanks! Top. via some kernel panic has much impact on the work that can be done on e. I have several questions : Re: LACP CCR2004 - Huawei Switch not working Post by skotti » Fri Apr 29, 2022 12:20 pm I can confirm that's a bug in ROS 7. 6 - hw-offload on bond 802. Changes in this release: *) api - fixed comma encoding within URL when using the ". 8rc2. Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2021 12:27 pm. Config on CRS326-24G-2S+ 2) In a more complex setup I am able to get non-VLAN traffic from another port on the CCR (like sfp28-2) to any VLAN on the bridge to be offloaded. 41 as far as I know. Hardware offload only applies to traffic between ethernet ports passing through the switch chip. Hello all, We have a customer who is trying to create a 2 gig ports Port-Channel with our router and the LACP is not working. Any chance of an ETA now? on CCR2216 99% of people will most likely use some form of VRF which kills any form of L3HW from being available. Limitations of fw-offload (as of 7. Hardware offload is 2) In a more complex setup I am able to get non-VLAN traffic from another port on the CCR (like sfp28-2) to any VLAN on the bridge to be offloaded. RouterOS beta. You should check this guide for similar setup to yours: https: I know the LACP implementation from other network vendors, where forming an LACP with one link only is no issue. Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 3:19 pm [6. 3ad and balance-xor bonding modes are hardware offloaded, other bonding modes will use the CPU's resources. Have you tried it on the CRS317? Did you solve it? My goal is to connect my servers via LACP to both switches. Allegedly MikroTik allows you to blackhole routes with a destination IP address, and I was able to sink 14. 6 long term. When we force the mode ON on both sides of the port-channel it works and we have connectivity but as soon as we change the mode to LACP (channel-group 1 mode active) it doesn't work. RouterOS 6. Community discussions. I am working with a CRS 326 version 6. On interface "backup-src" a FreeBSD 12. From there, you can see: Your device has a bottleneck between the CPU and the switch chip (which makes sense, it's not exactly a router, just a routing-capable switch) . Configure all your Layer 2 stuff first: 1) Configure port L2MTU's, configure bonds (LACP) 2) Build your bridge, add ports to bridge 3) Create VLANs (assigned to bridge), change VLAN MTUs (if not 1500), assign IP's to VLANs, enable VLANs on bridge ports Currently the Cisco switch is working nicely together with a HP switch (which I want to replace with the CRS326) using an existing LACP bond. BUT on the L3HW documentation page, it does say "It is recommended to turn off L3HW offloading during L2 configuration. Hardware offloading for bonding interface not working in CRS326. 3ad / LACP bonding with VLANs, no HW offload. I'm MikroTik. No problem with non-bond port 2) In a more complex setup I am able to get non-VLAN traffic from another port on the CCR (like sfp28-2) to any VLAN on the bridge to be offloaded. the FW compatible L3HW offload is not working with inter-vlan traffic. Hardware usage: Not significant ; Quick Setup Guide. Search Search. 1 and in 7. Instead of getting the expected line-rate routing, it all appears to be going through the CPU which jumps to 100% and provides It seems that SwOS only supports LACP load balancing based on Layer2 and Layer3 hashing. Quote #1; Wed May 16, but found hardware offloading not to be active on the bond after following the guide. General. 6, and 7. 43rc44] Hardware offloaded bridge and 'Switch Port Isolation' not working. proplist" argument; *) bridge - properly process IPsec decapsulated packets through the firewall when the "use-ip-firewall" option is enabled; *) capsman - require a unique name for configuration and configuration pre-sets; *) certificate - fixed new CRL updating I have replaced the 1072 to the 317 to have more ports, hardware lacp, and hardware routing. Other topics. Only CRS3xx devices support 802. Post by densukke » Thu Jan 05, 2023 12 Nice to hear that hardware routing works and ipfix got fixed! Connection tracking does not work with hardware routing since the packets never enter the CPU, and the switch chip does not provide the routing performance data. Peer ports can also be configured as LACP bonding interfaces. Before I updated it, it used to have a vlan interface for each vlan on ether1, then a vlan specific bridge with vlan filtering enabled with the wireless interfaces For devices that have multiple switch chips (for example, RB2011, RB3011, RB1100), each switch chip is only able to switch VLAN traffic between ports that are on the same switch chip, VLAN filtering will not work on a hardware level between ports that are on different switch chips, this means you should not add all ports to a single bridge if you are intending to MikroTik. Configure all your Layer 2 stuff first: 1) Configure port L2MTU's, configure bonds (LACP) 2) Build your bridge, add ports to bridge 3) Create VLANs (assigned to bridge), change VLAN MTUs (if not 1500), assign IP's to VLANs, enable VLANs on bridge ports Introduction. Dear Mikrotik team. Hardware talk. rqdhdxm oweuh tcai tyryoe shux qxool cgnw qphh atjkpmrv ayvmit